Starting a branch
Start small. Finish something.
Before you read on
Nothing here asks anything of you. It is an explanation of how these things work, written so that anyone weighing up whether to bother has the full picture rather than the sales pitch.
Worth knowing
- You do not have to join the party to be part of this.
- You do not have to take a position, now or later.
- You do not have to agree with the Nationals on everything.
- You do not have to come to another meeting.
- Deciding it is not for you is a perfectly reasonable answer.
If it does go ahead
A branch here would be run by the people in this shire, not from an office somewhere else. What it works on, how often it meets and how much it takes on would be decided by whoever ends up in it. The rest of this playbook is what that has looked like when it works.
What a branch actually is
A branch is a group of locals who meet, listen to what is going on around them, and get one useful thing done at a time. It is closer to a progress association than to anything you have seen on the news.
It is not an election machine that wakes up every four years, and it is not a room where people argue about federal politics. Most of what a working branch does is unglamorous and local: noticing that a service has quietly stopped, hearing the same complaint from three different people and realising it is a pattern, getting an answer for someone who could not get one on their own.
It also gives Bevan something he cannot get from an office in Perth or Manjimup, which is a straight account of what is actually happening in Augusta, in Cowaramup, in Witchcliffe, before it turns into a crisis.
Our shire
Warren-Blackwood covers six shires and the aim is a branch in each, so that no shire is represented by whoever happens to live nearest the main town. This is the one this copy is written around. [SET: confirm town list for this shire.]
Five short parts
They are meant to be read in order the first time. After that, go straight to whichever one you need. None takes more than ten minutes.
Start
How few people it takes to begin, what each job actually involves, and how a branch looks after the people in it.
Open Start → Part 2 · Months 2 and 3Act
What a meeting is actually like, what happens when you walk in the door, and where something you raise ends up.
Open Act → Part 3 · The first yearGrow
Reaching past the main town, choosing a year that fits the people who are actually there, and knowing whether it is working.
Open Grow →Part 4: the toolkit
The forms and checklists, each with a filled-in example so you can see what good looks like before you start.
Part 5: the first meeting record
One page at the back of the toolkit. If a branch does get started, this is what it writes down at its first meeting: names, jobs, dates, and when it meets next.
Questions people usually have
How much time is this really going to take? +
For most people, a 90 minute meeting every month or two, plus an hour here and there. Office bearers carry more, roughly two to four hours a month, and the real numbers are set out in Start rather than discovered later. Where a job turns out to be bigger than the person agreed to, that is a problem with the job, not the person.
Do I have to join the Nationals? +
No. Plenty of people help with one project and never join anything, and plenty of them are useful to their shire for years. If you want to know how to join, ask and someone will tell you. Nobody will raise it with you twice.
I do not agree with the Nationals on everything. Am I in the wrong room? +
No. A group where everyone already agrees will not notice much. What matters more is whether you want this shire to work better and are willing to be straight about what you see.
Is this just more meetings? +
It is a fair worry, and it is how most groups like this go wrong. The test in this playbook is not how many times a branch met. It is whether it finished something useful in 90 days. Meetings run 90 minutes, not until everyone is tired, and no more than three jobs leave any one of them.
We have five people interested. Is that enough? +
Yes. Four to six is a starting branch, and a starting branch has had a good year if its meetings actually happen, newcomers are made welcome and one local job gets finished. Twelve volunteers are not a precondition. See Start.
I have a problem I need help with right now. +
Then you should not have to wait for a branch to exist. Speak to the electorate office directly, or raise it through the site, and it goes to someone whose job it is. A branch meeting is not the place to talk through a private situation, and nobody will ask you to. [SET: link Raise It / contact page.]
What happens to something I mention at a meeting? +
It gets written down in plain language, checked, sent to whoever can actually do something about it, and then someone comes back to you and says what happened, including when the answer is no. The full path is set out in Act.
All five parts of the playbook